Almost every buyer I work with asks the same question about an HOA, and it's the wrong one. They ask what the dues are.

I understand why. It's the number on the listing, it's the number that goes into the loan qualification, and it's the number that feels like it's costing you something. But I've watched buyers pass on a well-run building with $700 dues and buy into a poorly run one at $450, and the second one turned out to be far more expensive. The dues tell you what the association is collecting right now. They tell you very little about what it's going to need.

The good news is that almost everything you'd actually want to know is written down, and in California you have a legal right to most of it before you commit. Associations are required to disclose their reserve position, their assessment plans, their insurance, their pending litigation, and — new as of this year — their balcony inspection report. Very few buyers read past the first page.

And for what it's worth: most of the packets I review come back fine. The point of knowing what to look for isn't to talk you out of an entire category of housing — it's to catch the ones that aren't, which is an afternoon of reading, not a leap of faith.

This is what I'd want a buyer of mine to understand, and it applies whether you're looking at a high-rise Downtown, a townhome in Civita, a beachfront tower in Coronado Shores, or a detached home in a master-planned community in Carmel Valley or Del Sur. I'll also cover Mello-Roos at the end, because in San Diego it gets confused with HOA dues constantly, and there are a few communities where what people believe is simply out of date.

The short version
  • Dues are a symptom, not a diagnosis. Low dues with underfunded reserves is the expensive combination.
  • 2026 changed condo lending materially. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac overhauled project standards in March, more of it took effect in August, and the reserve requirement rises again in January 2027.
  • The balcony inspection report is now part of your disclosure package. A California law effective January 1, 2026 added it to what a seller must hand you.
  • The assessment caps don't protect you where it matters. There's an emergency exception with no ceiling, and safety findings fall squarely inside it.
  • Mello-Roos is not an HOA fee. Different bill, different enforcement, and it can expire. Some of what people "know" about which San Diego communities have it is wrong.

What Your Dues Actually Pay For

Every association's budget splits into two fundamentally different things, and conflating them is where most of the trouble starts.

Operating expenses are this year's costs. Insurance, utilities for common areas, landscaping, management fees, pool service, elevator maintenance contracts, security, trash. These are real and recurring, and they're the reason dues in an amenity-heavy high-rise run several times what they do in a small townhome association with a shared driveway and not much else.

Reserves are the savings account for things that wear out on a long cycle — the roof, the elevators, the boilers, the private roads, the paint, the pool resurfacing, the waterproofing membrane under the deck. Nobody sees the reserve contribution. It doesn't buy you anything you can point at this month. Which is exactly why it's the first line a board under pressure trims when owners complain about a dues increase.

Two very different things inside one monthly number
Operating
Reserves
Operating — insurance, common-area utilities, landscaping, management, elevator and pool contracts, security, trash. This year's costs, spent this year.
Reserves — roof, elevators, boilers, private roads, paint, pool resurfacing, waterproofing. Future costs, saved for now.
Proportions vary widely by association and building type — this is illustrative, not a benchmark. The point is that only one of these two buys you something you can see this month, which is why it's the one that gets cut.

An association that keeps dues flat for eight years by shorting reserves hasn't saved anyone money. It has moved the cost from a predictable monthly line item into an unpredictable lump sum, and it has moved it onto whoever happens to own the unit when the bill arrives. If you're buying, that could be you.

The Number That Matters More Than the Dues

California requires associations to do a reserve study (Civil Code §5550) — a professional assessment of what the major components are, how much life they have left, what they'll cost to replace, and how much needs to be set aside each year to get there. The board has to commission a visual inspection at least every three years and review the study annually.

What comes out of that study is a number called percent funded: what the association actually has in reserves as a share of what it should have. It shows up in the annual budget report, along with the reserve deficiency expressed per unit — in other words, your share of the shortfall if it had to be made up today.

There's also a question buried in the required disclosure form that I think is the single most useful sentence in the entire packet. Paraphrased, it asks the board: based on the reserve study, will the reserves be sufficient to meet the association's repair and replacement obligations over the next 30 years? The board has to answer yes or no. If the answer is no, they have to say what additional assessments will be necessary and when.

A board that has already written down “no” and told you an assessment is coming has done you an enormous favor. Read the form.

There's a companion disclosure that gets read even less: the annual budget report (§5300) requires the board to state whether it has decided to defer or not undertake repairs on any major component with 30 years or less of remaining life, and justify it. That's a board putting in writing that it knows something needs work and has chosen to wait. It's worth finding.

I won't give you a bright-line percent-funded number to accept or reject, because context matters — a brand-new building with low reserves is a different situation from a 1970s building with low reserves and a roof at the end of its life. But the pattern that should slow you down is consistent: low percent funded, a "no" on the 30-year question, deferred components disclosed, and dues that haven't moved in years. That's not four problems. It's one problem showing up four ways.

What Changed in 2026: Condo Lending

This is the part that surprises people, including plenty of agents, because it happened quietly and it happened fast. If you looked at condos two or three years ago and are looking again now, the financing rules are not the same.

After the Surfside collapse in 2021, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac added requirements aimed at building safety and deferred maintenance. Those became permanent policy. Then in March 2026 both issued a substantial overhaul, with pieces taking effect through August 2026 and into January 2027.

Here's what actually matters to a buyer.

What changed, and when
  1. March 18, 2026
    The overhaul lands. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac issue matching updates to condo project standards. Project review is waived entirely for projects of 10 or fewer units, and the investor-concentration and owner-occupancy limits that blocked loans in rental-heavy buildings are retired.
  2. July 1, 2026
    Master insurance deductibles get a hard ceiling. Per-unit deductibles capped at $50,000, per-occurrence at 5% of coverage, with separate wildfire and windstorm deductibles each required to comply on their own.
  3. August 3, 2026
    The abbreviated review paths close. Limited Review and Streamlined Review retired for new applications, and the baseline reserve funding method is no longer accepted.
  4. January 4, 2027 — still ahead
    Reserve requirement rises from 10% to 15% of annual budgeted assessment income. Associations budgeting to the old minimum will have to move, and moving means a dues increase.
Dates apply to loan application dates, not closing dates. Both agencies moved together, but their rules differ in the details.

The easy review path is gone

Fannie's Limited Review and Freddie's Streamlined Review — the abbreviated paths that let a loan on an established project skip most of the project-level scrutiny at a low loan-to-value — were retired for loan applications dated on or after August 3, 2026. Established projects now go through full review or qualify for a waiver.

Practical translation: a project that used to slide through on a big down payment now gets the full questionnaire, the budget test, the reserve test, and the repair review. If you were counting on putting 25% down to avoid a project problem, that lever is gone.

Reserve requirements are rising

Both agencies currently require an association to budget at least 10% of its annual assessment income to replacement reserves. For applications dated on or after January 4, 2027, that goes to 15%.

A reserve study can be used instead of the flat budget percentage, but as of August 2026 the baseline funding method — the approach that lets the reserve balance approach zero without going negative — is no longer acceptable, and the budget has to reflect the highest allocation the study recommends. A special assessment doesn't count toward the reserve requirement either.

One caveat that applies to this entire section: these are the agency guidelines. Individual lenders layer their own overlays on top and are often stricter, and Fannie's and Freddie's rules differ in the details and in their effective dates. Clearing the thresholds here doesn't guarantee your loan — your lender's answer on your file is the only one that counts.

I'd expect this to be the single biggest source of friction in 2027. Associations that have been budgeting to the old 10% minimum are going to have to move, and moving means a dues increase.

Repairs and assessments can make a project ineligible

A project is ineligible for conventional financing if it needs critical repairs — anything materially affecting safety, soundness, structural integrity, or habitability. Waterproofing, elevators, stairwells, balconies, electrical systems and sea walls are named examples. A project that failed a mandatory structural inspection is ineligible until the repairs are done and documented. A building under an evacuation order for unsafe conditions is ineligible until it's remediated.

Separately, unfunded deferred maintenance over roughly $10,000 per unit that should be addressed within the next 12 months makes a project ineligible. Note the word unfunded — if the association has passed a special assessment or taken a loan to pay for the work, that's acceptable. Funding the fix generally cures it, assuming the association can document it.

Lenders also have to review any structural or mechanical inspection report from the past three years, and delinquency matters: no more than 15% of units can be 60 or more days behind on assessments.

Insurance deductibles can now disqualify a building

This one deserves its own paragraph because it's the trap of the moment. Effective for applications on or after July 1, 2026, the master policy's per-unit deductible is capped at $50,000 per unit, and the per-occurrence deductible remains capped at 5% of the coverage amount. Where a policy carries separate deductibles for perils like windstorm or wildfire, each of those has to independently comply.

Think about what that means. For three years, the standard way for a board to keep a master insurance premium survivable has been to raise the deductible. An association that raised its deductible past the cap to protect its budget can render its own building unfinanceable — for every buyer, and therefore for every seller, in the project.

The picture isn't one-directional, though, and I want to be fair about that. The same 2026 updates loosened several things in response to the insurance market: roofs no longer require replacement-cost coverage, the inflation guard requirement was dropped, documentation of replacement cost got more flexible, project review was waived entirely for projects of 10 or fewer units, and the investor-concentration and owner-occupancy limits that used to block loans in rental-heavy buildings were retired. Some buildings that were unfinanceable in 2024 are financeable now.

The list nobody tells the HOA about

Fannie Mae maintains project eligibility status in a system its lenders can see. A project flagged as unavailable can't have loans delivered to Fannie, no matter how strong your file is. Freddie Mac has a parallel not eligible status.

Two things worth knowing. First, it's the project that's flagged, not you — a perfect borrower can't overcome it. Second, associations generally aren't notified. Boards routinely find out because a sale falls apart.

There is now a way to check. Fannie operates a free lookup for HOAs, management companies and their authorized representatives at condostatus.fanniemae.com, and Fannie has said more than 2,000 projects have had their status updated since 2022 after documentation was submitted. Freddie has a form through which an association's authorized representative can inquire and appeal. If you're on a board, this is a twenty-minute task that is worth more than almost anything else on your agenda.

I'd add one thing for buyers: FHA and VA are separate systems with separate approvals. FHA maintains its own approved-project list and a single-unit approval path with its own caps and owner-occupancy thresholds; VA approves projects only, with no single-unit equivalent. A building being fine for a conventional loan tells you nothing about FHA or VA, and vice versa. If you're using government financing, that question needs to be asked early — not the week before closing.

California's Balcony Inspection Law, and the Report You're Now Owed

California law (Civil Code §5551, from SB 326) requires condominium associations to inspect exterior elevated elements — balconies, decks, stairways, walkways and elevated entries that are more than six feet above the ground and supported substantially by wood. The inspection has to be done by a licensed architect or structural or civil engineer, on a statistically significant sample, and repeated at least every nine years. The findings are supposed to be folded into the reserve study.

The first deadline was January 1, 2025. It has passed. An association that hasn't done it isn't approaching a deadline — it's past one.

I want to flag one piece of misinformation here because it's a common misreading and it's circulating widely: a 2024 bill did extend a balcony inspection deadline to January 1, 2026 — but that bill amended the apartment statute, and it expressly excludes common interest developments. The condominium deadline was never extended.

The part that's new and directly useful to you: as of January 1, 2026, the most recent inspection report is a required item in the disclosure package a seller must provide (SB 410, adding §4525(a)(11)). It's also now an association record you can inspect. That change happened for a specific reason — lenders had started conditioning condo loans on compliance, and buyers were discovering mid-escrow that no report existed.

So ask for it. And when you get it, look for three things: whether any element was found to pose an immediate threat, whether the recommended repairs made it into the reserve study, and whether they got funded. If the inspector found a problem, the association has to act — including restricting access to the element until repairs are approved.

If the report doesn't exist, you're looking at an association that appears to be well past a mandatory obligation, with an unpriced repair liability and a potential financing problem. That isn't automatically a reason to walk. It is a reason to slow down and price it.

Why Dues Went Up: The Insurance Story

If you've owned in an association anywhere in California over the last three years, you already know insurance is a large part of why your dues moved. It's worth understanding the shape of it, because the situation in September 2026 is genuinely different from 2023 — in both directions.

The hard part first. The California FAIR Plan — the insurer of last resort, the backstop when nobody in the standard market will write the risk — has grown enormously. As of June 2026 it held roughly 697,000 policies with about $768 billion in exposure, up more than 150% in policy count since September 2022. After the January 2025 Los Angeles wildfires it levied a $1 billion assessment on member insurers, the first in over thirty years, and in February 2026 the state authorized it to take a $600 million line of credit. A FAIR Plan rate increase of 29.1% was approved to take effect October 15, 2026. It's also a limited product: it doesn't cover water damage, theft, or liability, so an association relying on it needs a wraparound policy to approximate real coverage.

The more encouraging part. The state's Sustainable Insurance Strategy lets carriers use catastrophe modeling and pass through reinsurance costs in exchange for committing to write in distressed areas, and several carriers have made those commitments. FAIR Plan growth has decelerated sharply — roughly 16,000 new residential policies in the first quarter of 2026, against 35,000 to 50,000 a quarter through 2024 and much of 2025. In March 2026 State Farm General settled with the state on rates including a reduction on its California condominium line. In September 2026 Allstate filed to resume writing new California homeowners policies for the first time since 2022, though as of this writing that filing hasn't been approved. The state also raised the FAIR Plan's commercial limits in 2025 specifically to help associations access coverage.

What this means for you as a buyer is narrower and more practical than the headlines. Get the master policy declarations page and read the deductibles, including any separate wildfire or windstorm deductible. Then price your own individual walls-in policy during your contingency period rather than assuming a number. If the master policy carries a per-unit deductible, expect your lender to require your own policy, sized to cover that deductible. Ask your insurance agent specifically about loss assessment coverage, which is what responds when the association passes a deductible or an uninsured loss through to owners. It's usually inexpensive, and the limit people carry by default is often much smaller than the exposure.

Special Assessments and the Caps That Won't Save You

California limits what a board can do without a member vote. Under Civil Code §5605, regular assessments can't be raised more than 20% over the prior year, and special assessments can't exceed 5% of budgeted gross expenses in aggregate for the year, without approval from a majority of a quorum of the members.

Buyers hear that and relax. I'd rather you didn't, because of the exception.

Those caps don't apply to emergencies (§5610), and "emergency" is defined more broadly than people assume. It covers an extraordinary expense required by a court order; an extraordinary expense necessary to repair or maintain the development where a threat to personal health or safety, or another hazardous condition, is discovered; and an extraordinary expense that couldn't reasonably have been foreseen when the budget was prepared, which requires the board to adopt written findings explaining why.

Read that middle one alongside the balcony inspection section above. An inspection that finds an immediate threat to safety is precisely a discovered threat to personal health or safety. At that point the board can levy what the repair costs, with no percentage ceiling and no member vote. The 20% and 5% caps offer you no protection at all in the scenario most likely to generate a large bill.

This is not an argument against buying a condo. It's an argument for reading the inspection report and the reserve study before you're the owner of record.

The Documents You Get, and How to Actually Read Them

In a California sale the seller is required to provide a defined set of association documents (Civil Code §4525). On written request the association generally has to produce them within about ten days (§4530), for a fee limited to its actual cost, disclosed in advance on a standard form. Here's what's in the package and what each item is actually good for.

Your HOA Document Review
What to request · what it tells you · what should slow you down
DocumentWhat It Tells YouWhat Should Slow You Down
Reserve study & reserve summaryPercent funded, remaining life of major components, your per-unit share of any shortfallLow percent funded on an aging building with flat dues
Assessment & reserve funding disclosureThe board's yes/no on whether reserves will cover 30 years of obligationsA “no” with no funding plan attached
Annual budget reportOperating vs. reserve split, insurance summary, loans, and any deferred major componentsA written statement that repairs are being deferred
Balcony / elevated element reportCondition of decks, balconies, stairways; whether anything is an immediate threatNo report at all, or findings absent from the reserve study
Master insurance certificateCoverage amount, per-occurrence and per-unit deductibles, separate peril deductiblesA per-unit deductible at or above the lending cap
12 months of board minutesWhat the board is actually arguing about before it becomes a disclosureRepeated discussion of a repair with no funding decision
Assessment & delinquency statementCurrent dues, approved-but-not-yet-due increases, unpaid amounts on the unitAn increase already approved that isn't in the listing
CC&Rs, bylaws & rulesRental restrictions, architectural rules, pets, parking, what you may and may not changeA rental cap or minimum lease term you didn't plan for
Litigation & construction defect disclosuresPending claims, defect settlements, and how settlement money was spentStructural litigation — it can block conventional financing outright

Two notes on using this. First, request the documents early — the ten-day production window plus your reading time has to fit inside your contingency period, and it often doesn't if you wait. Second, the board minutes are the most underrated item on the list. Formal disclosures tell you what the association has concluded. The minutes tell you what it's been arguing about for the last year, which is usually where next year's disclosure is being born.

One more thing that belongs here: if a community is age-restricted, the law requires the seller to provide a statement that the development is subject to and complies with the applicable senior housing provisions. If you're looking at housing that's marketed as age-restricted, that document should be in the package, and its absence is worth asking about.

Mello-Roos Is Not an HOA Fee

This is the most common point of confusion I run into in San Diego, and it costs people real money because they either double-count it or miss it entirely.

Mello-Roos is a special tax levied by a public agency — a city, a county, a school district — through a Community Facilities District, to pay off bonds that financed public infrastructure. Schools, roads, sewers, parks. It's not a fee your association charges. It's on your property tax bill as a separate line item, it's secured by a recorded lien against the parcel, and non-payment follows the property tax enforcement path rather than the HOA lien path.

Three different charges people call “the HOA fee”
HOA Dues
Billed by
Your association or its management company, usually monthly
Pays for
Private common areas, master insurance, amenities, reserves
Does it end?
No — it runs as long as you own
If unpaid
Association lien, and eventually HOA foreclosure
Mello-Roos (CFD)
Billed by
The County, on your property tax bill, twice a year
Pays for
Public infrastructure — schools, roads, sewers, parks — and the bonds that funded it
Does it end?
Usually yes, when the bonds mature
If unpaid
Property tax enforcement, including accelerated foreclosure
Maintenance District
Billed by
The County, on your property tax bill
Pays for
Ongoing public upkeep such as landscaping and lighting in the district
Does it end?
No — it funds maintenance, not debt
If unpaid
Property tax enforcement
A single property can carry all three at once, and several San Diego master-planned communities do.

A few practical points the columns don't capture:

  • Who bills it. The County, twice a year with your property taxes — not your association, not monthly.
  • What it buys. Public infrastructure and the bonds that paid for it — not your pool, your landscaping, or your building's roof.
  • Whether it ends. Mello-Roos bonds are typically structured to mature within about 30 years, and the tax generally ends with them — though terms vary. The City of San Diego's own districts have bonds maturing between 2020 and 2037, and the disclosure notice states the ending year for a specific parcel. HOA dues never end.
  • Whether it grows. Most districts carry an annual escalator, so the amount typically rises each year until it terminates.
  • Deductibility. Generally not deductible, because it funds specific local benefits rather than general public welfare. A maintenance or services component may be treated differently. Ask your CPA — and note the tax bill often doesn't break out which portion is which.

Two traps. First, a community can have both, and plenty of San Diego master-planned communities do — sometimes a city district and a school district on the same parcel, stacked. Second, a "maintenance assessment district" line on your tax bill is a third thing: not Mello-Roos and not an HOA.

What this looks like around San Diego

A few specifics, because the local folklore is out of date in both directions.

Liberty Station is covered by a Mello-Roos district — City of San Diego CFD No. 3. This one surprises people constantly, because Liberty Station doesn't read as a typical master-planned CFD community.

Scripps Ranch generally no longer does. The Miramar Ranch North district was closed and dissolved in July 2021. What remains on the tax bill there is landscape maintenance, which is a different and much smaller thing. If someone tells you Scripps Ranch has Mello-Roos, they're working from old information.

Civita doesn't show up on the CFD rolls either — the charge on tax bills there is the Civita Maintenance Assessment District, on top of real HOA dues. So a Civita buyer is looking at two separate housing charges, and neither one is a CFD. Torrey Hills is similar: a landscape maintenance district rather than a city CFD.

Districts that do show up in City and County records include Santaluz (City CFD No. 2), Del Sur and the broader Black Mountain Ranch area (a city district plus a Poway Unified district), 4S Ranch (Poway Unified), and Carmel Valley, whose district is still recorded under the area's original planning name, North City West — at more than 8,000 parcels it's the largest single CFD parcel count I found in the county. Pacific Highlands Ranch sits inside school district CFDs from the same era.

None of that is a statement about any particular property. CFD boundaries follow tract and annexation lines, not neighborhood names, and districts get created, refinanced and dissolved over time. Two homes a block apart in the same community can carry completely different tax bills. Treat all of it as a starting point and confirm against the actual parcel.

For Rancho Peñasquitos, Sabre Springs and Carmel Mountain Ranch, it depends on the parcel and when the tract was built. Older tracts generally predate the districts. I wouldn't make a blanket statement about any of those three — check the specific property.

On amounts: a 2022 San Diego County Grand Jury review found the average Mello-Roos tax paid by county homeowners was about $2,162 per year as of fiscal 2020–21, that roughly 102,000 of the county's 936,000 taxed residential properties were subject to it, and that about 61,000 of those paid into more than one district. That last figure is the important one. The number that matters isn't a community average — it's the actual stack on the actual parcel. Pull the real tax bill.

California requires a seller to make a good-faith effort to obtain and deliver a Mello-Roos disclosure notice showing the current tax, the maximum tax, the annual increase, and the year the levy ends. In practice this usually arrives inside a third-party report in escrow. The Grand Jury's criticism was that disclosure technically happens but gets buried in a stack of closing documents — which is exactly why buyers are surprised at closing. Ask for it specifically, and read it.

Carmel Valley — where a single home can carry HOA dues and a Mello-Roos district at the same time. Separate obligations, separate rules, separate bills.

What I'd Actually Do

If you're buying into an association in San Diego, here's the sequence I'd follow.

  • Ask for the documents the day you open escrow. Not the week before contingencies are up. The production window plus your reading time has to fit.
  • Read the 30-year sufficiency answer first. It's one word, and it reframes everything else in the packet.
  • Find the balcony report if it's a wood-frame building with elevated decks or walkways. Confirm the findings made it into the reserve study and got funded.
  • Read the master policy deductibles, including separate wildfire and windstorm deductibles, and check them against what your lender can accept.
  • Have your lender confirm project eligibility early — conventional, and separately FHA or VA if that's your financing. Don't let this surface at underwriting.
  • Read twelve months of minutes. It's the least fun hour of your diligence and usually the most informative.
  • Price your own insurance during the contingency period, and ask specifically about loss assessment coverage limits.
  • Pull the actual property tax bill and identify every line: base tax, any CFD, any maintenance district. Then add HOA dues separately.
  • Ask what dues have done over five years, not just what they are today. Flat dues on an aging building is a finding, not a feature.

The Honest Bottom Line

I'm not down on HOAs, and I'd push back on anyone who tells you to avoid them. A well-run association is genuinely valuable. It maintains things you'd otherwise have to manage yourself, it insures the structure, it keeps a building or community looking the way it looked when you bought, and it spreads the cost of expensive shared systems across everyone who uses them. A lot of the best housing in San Diego — a great deal of what's walkable, coastal, or newer — comes with one, and that's not a compromise.

What I'd ask you to give up is the idea that the dues number tells you whether the association is any good. It doesn't. A high-dues association that funds its reserves, keeps its inspections current, carries a deductible its owners can absorb, and tells its members the truth in writing is a much safer place to put your money than a low-dues association coasting toward a bill it hasn't named yet.

Most of that is knowable before you remove your contingencies — and the parts that aren't, you can at least identify as unknown and price accordingly. That's what I want you to take away. This isn't a risk you have to accept blind. It's one you can read about in documents you're legally entitled to receive, in however long your contingency period actually runs.

If you're weighing a specific building or community and want a second set of eyes on the packet, that's a conversation we're always happy to have. And if you're still narrowing down where you want to be, our neighborhood guides cover the areas across San Diego where associations are part of the picture.

A necessary note: I'm a REALTOR®, not an attorney, a CPA, an insurance broker, or a lender. This article is general information about how HOAs, disclosures, lending guidelines and special taxes work in California and San Diego County — it is not legal, tax, insurance, or lending advice, and it isn't a substitute for reviewing the actual documents for a specific property. Statutes, agency guidelines and insurance conditions change; lending requirements in particular changed several times in 2026 and change again in January 2027. Verify anything that affects your decision with the appropriate licensed professional and with the association itself. Three specifics worth repeating: the lending thresholds described here are agency guidelines, and individual lenders may be stricter; Mello-Roos and assessment district information is parcel-specific and changes over time, so confirm any community's status against the property's actual tax bill and County records; and the insurance and market figures cited are as-of statistics from third-party public sources, not my own data. Information current as of September 2026.